Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)

Belarus
15.4%
in 2024
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
3.9%
in 2024
Belarus rank
38th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
39th

Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use) over time

  • Belarus
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
051015199020072024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 15.4% against 3.9% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 11.5%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 4.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Belarus ranks 38th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 2.7% 2.7% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2000s 0.0% 3.0% 3.0% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 0.1% 3.4% 3.3% Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 8.1% 3.7% 4.4% Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alternative and nuclear energy, Belarus or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Belarus, at 15.4% against 3.9% in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2024.
What is the difference in alternative and nuclear energy between Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
11.5%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for alternative and nuclear energy?
Belarus ranks 38th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Alternative and nuclear energy. Statizoid, drawing on IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA). Retrieved 25 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/alternative-and-nuclear-energy-percent-of-total-energy-use/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/alternative-and-nuclear-energy-percent-of-total-energy-use/belarus/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Belarus vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Alternative and nuclear energy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)
Unit
% of total energy use
Source
IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
197 places, 6,790 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others. This is the share of total energy supply that is non-fossil.