Belgium vs Kyrgyzstan: Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)
Belgium
21.0%
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
21.8%
in 2024
Belgium rank
23rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
22nd
Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use) over time
- Belgium
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 21.8% against 21.0% in Belgium, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 151 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.6% | 28.5% | 6.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 21.5% | 39.5% | 18.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 20.0% | 29.6% | 9.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 23.3% | 25.7% | 2.4% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alternative and nuclear energy, Belgium or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 21.8% against 21.0% in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in alternative and nuclear energy between Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.8%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Kyrgyzstan?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for alternative and nuclear energy?
- Belgium ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 22nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others. This is the share of total energy supply that is non-fossil.