Congo vs Malaysia: Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)
Congo
2.9%
in 2024
Malaysia
3.0%
in 2024
Congo rank
99th
Malaysia rank
98th
Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use) over time
- Congo
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 3.0% against 2.9% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.2% | 1.4% | 2.9% | Congo |
| 2000s | 3.0% | 0.9% | 2.1% | Congo |
| 2010s | 3.0% | 1.6% | 1.4% | Congo |
| 2020s | 2.9% | 2.9% | 0.0% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alternative and nuclear energy, Congo or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 3.0% against 2.9% in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in alternative and nuclear energy between Congo and Malaysia?
- 0.1%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for alternative and nuclear energy?
- Congo ranks 99th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others. This is the share of total energy supply that is non-fossil.