East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Alternative and nuclear energy

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
9.5%
in 2023
Georgia
16.9%
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
34th
Georgia rank
33rd

Alternative and nuclear energy over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Georgia
0102030199020062023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 16.9% against 9.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 7.4%.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.8 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 33rd of 46 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.4% 11.7% 9.4% Georgia
2000s 3.7% 19.6% 15.9% Georgia
2010s 6.2% 18.1% 12.0% Georgia
2020s 9.3% 16.4% 7.1% Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher alternative and nuclear energy, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Georgia?
Georgia, at 16.9% against 9.5% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in alternative and nuclear energy between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia?
7.4%, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia rank globally for alternative and nuclear energy?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 33rd of 46 groups.
Where does this data come from?
IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Alternative and nuclear energy. Statizoid, drawing on IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/alternative-and-nuclear-energy-percent-of-total-energy-use/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/alternative-and-nuclear-energy-percent-of-total-energy-use/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/georgia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: Alternative and nuclear energy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use)
Unit
% of total energy use
Source
IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
197 places, 6,669 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others. This is the share of total energy supply that is non-fossil.