Malta vs Zimbabwe: Alternative and nuclear energy
Malta
3.8%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4.1%
in 2023
Malta rank
91st
Zimbabwe rank
88th
Alternative and nuclear energy over time
- Malta
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 4.1% against 3.8% in Malta, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 151 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 6.9% | 6.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.7% | 6.6% | 4.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3.7% | 5.7% | 2.1% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher alternative and nuclear energy, Malta or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 4.1% against 3.8% in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in alternative and nuclear energy between Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 0.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Malta and Zimbabwe rank globally for alternative and nuclear energy?
- Malta ranks 91st and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Alternative and nuclear energy (% of total energy use). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Clean energy is noncarbohydrate energy that does not produce carbon dioxide when generated. It includes hydropower and nuclear, geothermal, and solar power, among others. This is the share of total energy supply that is non-fossil.