Aruba vs Iceland: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Iceland
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Aruba rank
19th
Iceland rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Aruba
- Iceland
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Iceland, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 38 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Aruba or Iceland?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Aruba and Iceland?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Iceland?
- 38 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Iceland rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Aruba ranks 19th and Iceland ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.