Barbados vs Cuba: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Barbados
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Cuba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Barbados rank
19th
Cuba rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Barbados
- Cuba
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Cuba, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 19th and Cuba ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Barbados or Cuba?
- Barbados, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Barbados and Cuba?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Cuba?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Cuba rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Barbados ranks 19th and Cuba ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.