Bolivia vs Curacao: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Bolivia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Curacao
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Bolivia rank
19th
Curacao rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Bolivia
- Curacao
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Curacao, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 19th and Curacao ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Curacao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Bolivia or Curacao?
- Bolivia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Curacao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Bolivia and Curacao?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Curacao?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Curacao rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Bolivia ranks 19th and Curacao ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.