Botswana vs East Timor: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Botswana
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
East Timor
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Botswana rank
19th
East Timor rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Botswana
- East Timor
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in East Timor, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 21 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 19th and East Timor ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Botswana or East Timor?
- Botswana, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Botswana and East Timor?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Botswana ranks 19th and East Timor ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.