Chile vs Georgia: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Chile
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Georgia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Chile rank
19th
Georgia rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Chile
- Georgia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Georgia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 19th and Georgia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Chile or Georgia?
- Chile, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Chile and Georgia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Georgia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Georgia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Chile ranks 19th and Georgia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.