Congo vs Montenegro: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Congo
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Montenegro
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Congo rank
19th
Montenegro rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Congo
- Montenegro
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 19th and Montenegro ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Congo or Montenegro?
- Congo, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Congo and Montenegro?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Montenegro rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Congo ranks 19th and Montenegro ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.