Congo vs Nauru: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Congo
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Nauru
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Congo rank
19th
Nauru rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Congo
- Nauru
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Nauru, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 19th and Nauru ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Congo or Nauru?
- Congo, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Congo and Nauru?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Nauru?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
- How do Congo and Nauru rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Congo ranks 19th and Nauru ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.