Congo vs Serbia: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Congo
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Serbia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Congo rank
19th
Serbia rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Congo
- Serbia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Congo or Serbia?
- Congo, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Congo and Serbia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Congo ranks 19th and Serbia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.