Croatia vs Nauru: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Croatia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Nauru
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Croatia rank
20th
Nauru rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Croatia
- Nauru
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Nauru, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Croatia or Nauru?
- Croatia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Croatia and Nauru?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Nauru?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Nauru rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Croatia ranks 20th and Nauru ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.