Croatia vs Singapore: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Croatia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Singapore
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Croatia rank
20th
Singapore rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Croatia
- Singapore
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 20th and Singapore ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Croatia or Singapore?
- Croatia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Croatia and Singapore?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Singapore rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Croatia ranks 20th and Singapore ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.