Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Cuba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Cuba rank
19th
Zimbabwe rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Cuba
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Cuba or Zimbabwe?
- Cuba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Cuba ranks 19th and Zimbabwe ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.