Georgia vs Oman: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Georgia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Oman
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Georgia rank
19th
Oman rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Georgia
- Oman
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Oman, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 19th and Oman ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Georgia or Oman?
- Georgia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Oman as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Georgia and Oman?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Oman?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Oman rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Georgia ranks 19th and Oman ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.