Guam vs South Sudan: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Guam
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
South Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Guam rank
19th
South Sudan rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Guam
- South Sudan
How they compare
Guam currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 12 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Guam or South Sudan?
- Guam, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Guam and South Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Guam and South Sudan rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Guam ranks 19th and South Sudan ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.