Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Kazakhstan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Serbia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
20th
Serbia rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Kazakhstan ranks 20th and Serbia ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.