Malta vs Uganda: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Malta
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Uganda
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Malta rank
19th
Uganda rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Malta
- Uganda
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Uganda, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 44 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Malta or Uganda?
- Malta, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Malta and Uganda?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Uganda?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Uganda rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Malta ranks 19th and Uganda ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.