Moldova vs Sri Lanka: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Moldova
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Moldova rank
19th
Sri Lanka rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Moldova
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Moldova or Sri Lanka?
- Moldova, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Moldova and Sri Lanka?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Sri Lanka?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Sri Lanka rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Moldova ranks 19th and Sri Lanka ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.