Mongolia vs Zambia: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Mongolia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Mongolia rank
19th
Zambia rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Mongolia
- Zambia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Mongolia or Zambia?
- Mongolia, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Mongolia and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zambia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Zambia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Mongolia ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.