Nicaragua vs Zambia: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Nicaragua
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Nicaragua rank
20th
Zambia rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Nicaragua
- Zambia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 29 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Nicaragua ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Nicaragua or Zambia?
- Nicaragua, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Nicaragua and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zambia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Nicaragua and Zambia rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Nicaragua ranks 20th and Zambia ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.