Poland vs South Sudan: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Poland
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
South Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Poland rank
20th
South Sudan rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Poland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Poland or South Sudan?
- Poland, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Poland and South Sudan?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Poland and South Sudan rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Poland ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.