South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
South Sudan
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
South Sudan rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
20th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 215 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- South Sudan, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- South Sudan ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 20th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.