Sri Lanka vs East Timor: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear
Sri Lanka
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
East Timor
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
19th
East Timor rank
19th
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear over time
- Sri Lanka
- East Timor
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in East Timor, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 21 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 19th and East Timor ranks 19th of 218 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual change in primary energy from nuclear, Sri Lanka or East Timor?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from nuclear between Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and East Timor?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and East Timor rank globally for annual change in primary energy from nuclear?
- Sri Lanka ranks 19th and East Timor ranks 19th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.