Denmark vs Togo: Coal consumption, annual growth rate
Denmark
-59.17 % change on previous year
in 2025
Togo
-48.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Denmark rank
118th
Togo rank
115th
Coal consumption, annual growth rate over time
- Denmark
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports -48.01 % change on previous year against -59.17 % change on previous year in Denmark, a difference of 11.16 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Togo ahead.
Denmark ranks 118th and Togo ranks 115th of 137 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.96 % change on previous year | 13.56 % change on previous year | 20.52 % change on previous year | Togo |
| 2010s | -11.48 % change on previous year | 13.95 % change on previous year | 25.44 % change on previous year | Togo |
| 2020s | -9.67 % change on previous year | -13.9 % change on previous year | 4.23 % change on previous year | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal consumption, annual growth rate, Denmark or Togo?
- Togo, at -48.01 % change on previous year against -59.17 % change on previous year in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coal consumption, annual growth rate between Denmark and Togo?
- 11.16 % change on previous year, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Togo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and Togo rank globally for coal consumption, annual growth rate?
- Denmark ranks 118th and Togo ranks 115th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Coal consumption. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.