What is the difference in coal consumption, per capita between Chile and New Zealand?

0 terawatt-hours per person, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?

61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per capita

Chile

0 terawatt-hours per person

in 2025

New Zealand

0 terawatt-hours per person

in 2025

Chile rank

43rd

New Zealand rank

41st

Coal consumption, per capita over time

Chile
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Chile, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Zealand ahead.

Chile ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 41st of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	New Zealand
1970s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	New Zealand
1980s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	New Zealand
1990s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	New Zealand
2000s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	New Zealand
2010s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	Chile
2020s	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	0 terawatt-hours per person	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per capita, Chile or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per capita between Chile and New Zealand?: 0 terawatt-hours per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and New Zealand?: 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Chile and New Zealand rank globally for coal consumption, per capita?: Chile ranks 43rd and New Zealand ranks 41st of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-capita-2/chile/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-capita-2/chile/new-zealand/">Chile vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Coal consumption, per capita
Unit: terawatt-hours per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 205 places, 9,838 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed: 30 August 2026

Coal consumption divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.