Croatia vs Zambia: Coal consumption, per capita
Croatia
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2025
Zambia
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2024
Croatia rank
66th
Zambia rank
67th
Coal consumption, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Zambia
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Zambia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per person.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 66th and Zambia ranks 67th of 205 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Croatia |
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Croatia |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | 0 terawatt-hours per person | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal consumption, per capita, Croatia or Zambia?
- Croatia, at 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in coal consumption, per capita between Croatia and Zambia?
- 0 terawatt-hours per person, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for coal consumption, per capita?
- Croatia ranks 66th and Zambia ranks 67th of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal consumption divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.