Australia vs Belarus: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

Australia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
70th
Belarus rank
69th

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Belarus
00000196519942023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia ranks 70th and Belarus ranks 69th of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Belarus in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, Australia or Belarus?
Belarus, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between Australia and Belarus?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 70th and Belarus ranks 69th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belarus: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/australia/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/australia/belarus/">Australia vs Belarus: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.