Belarus vs Chile: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
69th
Chile rank
71st

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Chile
000000196519942023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 69th and Chile ranks 71st of 205 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, Belarus or Chile?
Belarus, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between Belarus and Chile?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 69th and Chile ranks 71st of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Chile: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belarus/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/belarus/chile/">Belarus vs Chile: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.