Chile vs Sweden: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

Chile
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
71st
Sweden rank
73rd

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Sweden
000000196519942023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Sweden ahead.

Chile ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, Chile or Sweden?
Chile, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between Chile and Sweden?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sweden?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sweden rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 71st and Sweden ranks 73rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sweden: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/chile/sweden/">Chile vs Sweden: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.