China vs Singapore: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

China
0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0054 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
5th
Singapore rank
3rd

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Singapore
00.0050.010.015196519942023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0054 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 2.0 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was China ahead.

China ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 205 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 5 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1970s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1980s 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
1990s 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0006 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2000s 0.0015 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0014 terawatt-hours per square kilometre China
2010s 0.0024 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0055 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0031 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0026 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0067 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0041 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, China or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0054 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between China and Singapore?
0.0027 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Singapore?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do China and Singapore rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
China ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 3rd of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Singapore: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/china/singapore/">China vs Singapore: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.