Colombia vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

Colombia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
72nd
New Zealand rank
74th

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Colombia
  • New Zealand
00000196519942023

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Colombia's figure about 1.2 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Zealand ahead.

Colombia ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 74th of 205 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
1970s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, Colombia or New Zealand?
Colombia, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between Colombia and New Zealand?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and New Zealand?
59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
How do Colombia and New Zealand rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
Colombia ranks 72nd and New Zealand ranks 74th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/colombia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/colombia/new-zealand/">Colombia vs New Zealand: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.