Eswatini vs Panama: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

Eswatini
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
60th
Panama rank
58th

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Panama
000000198020012023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 60th and Panama ranks 58th of 205 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Panama Difference Ahead
1980s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Eswatini
2020s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, Eswatini or Panama?
Panama, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between Eswatini and Panama?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Panama?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Panama rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 60th and Panama ranks 58th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Panama: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/panama/">Eswatini vs Panama: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.