New Caledonia vs Slovenia: Coal consumption, per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
31st
Slovenia rank
28th

Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Slovenia
0000.0010.0010.001198020012023

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.

New Caledonia ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 28th of 205 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0004 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Slovenia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Slovenia rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 28th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Slovenia: Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/slovenia/">New Caledonia vs Slovenia: Coal consumption, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal consumption, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 9,288 data points, 1965–2023
Last refreshed

Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.