New Zealand vs Sweden: Coal consumption, per square kilometre
New Zealand
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
74th
Sweden rank
73rd
Coal consumption, per square kilometre over time
- New Zealand
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 73rd of 205 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal consumption, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal consumption, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Sweden?
- 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
- 59 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2023.
- How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for coal consumption, per square kilometre?
- New Zealand ranks 74th and Sweden ranks 73rd of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coal consumption divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.