What is the difference in coal consumption, per unit of gdp between Republic of Korea and Morocco?

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Morocco?

61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Republic of Korea vs Morocco: Coal consumption, per unit of GDP

Republic of Korea

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Morocco

0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Republic of Korea rank

23rd

Morocco rank

22nd

Coal consumption, per unit of GDP over time

Republic of Korea
Morocco

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Republic of Korea ahead.

Republic of Korea ranks 23rd and Morocco ranks 22nd of 201 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Republic of Korea averaged higher in 6 and Morocco in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Republic of Korea	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
1970s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
1980s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
1990s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
2000s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
2010s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Republic of Korea
2020s	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal consumption, per unit of gdp, Republic of Korea or Morocco?: Morocco, at 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP against 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP in Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in coal consumption, per unit of gdp between Republic of Korea and Morocco?: 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Morocco?: 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
How do Republic of Korea and Morocco rank globally for coal consumption, per unit of gdp?: Republic of Korea ranks 23rd and Morocco ranks 22nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Coal consumption, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Republic of Korea vs Morocco: Coal consumption, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-consumption-per-unit-of-gdp/korea-rep/morocco/">Republic of Korea vs Morocco: Coal consumption, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Coal consumption, per unit of GDP
Unit: terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 201 places, 9,270 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed: 30 August 2026

Coal consumption divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.