Aruba vs Belarus: Electricity generation from coal per person
Aruba
0 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Belarus
2.22 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Aruba rank
83rd
Belarus rank
80th
Electricity generation from coal per person over time
- Aruba
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.22 kilowatt-hours against 0 kilowatt-hours in Aruba, a difference of 2.22 kilowatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 83rd and Belarus ranks 80th of 207 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 0.3147 kilowatt-hours | 0.3147 kilowatt-hours | Belarus |
| 2010s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 2.95 kilowatt-hours | 2.95 kilowatt-hours | Belarus |
| 2020s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 2.82 kilowatt-hours | 2.82 kilowatt-hours | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from coal per person, Aruba or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 2.22 kilowatt-hours against 0 kilowatt-hours in Aruba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from coal per person between Aruba and Belarus?
- 2.22 kilowatt-hours, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belarus?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Belarus rank globally for electricity generation from coal per person?
- Aruba ranks 83rd and Belarus ranks 80th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from coal per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in kilowatt-hours per person.