Aruba vs Belgium: Electricity generation from coal per person
Aruba
0 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Belgium
0 kilowatt-hours
in 2025
Aruba rank
85th
Belgium rank
85th
Electricity generation from coal per person over time
- Aruba
- Belgium
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 kilowatt-hours against 0 kilowatt-hours in Belgium, a difference of 0 kilowatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 85th and Belgium ranks 85th of 207 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 804.24 kilowatt-hours | 804.24 kilowatt-hours | Belgium |
| 2010s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 167.86 kilowatt-hours | 167.86 kilowatt-hours | Belgium |
| 2020s | 0 kilowatt-hours | 0 kilowatt-hours | 0 kilowatt-hours | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from coal per person, Aruba or Belgium?
- Aruba, at 0 kilowatt-hours against 0 kilowatt-hours in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from coal per person between Aruba and Belgium?
- 0 kilowatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Belgium?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Belgium rank globally for electricity generation from coal per person?
- Aruba ranks 85th and Belgium ranks 85th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from coal per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in kilowatt-hours per person.