Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coal production, per capita

Malawi
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2024
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0 terawatt-hours per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
61st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
60th

Coal production, per capita over time

  • Malawi
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0000196019922025

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per person.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.3 times Malawi's.

Across all 45 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 61st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 60th of 205 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person 0 terawatt-hours per person United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coal production, per capita, Malawi or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 0 terawatt-hours per person against 0 terawatt-hours per person in Malawi as of 2025.
What is the difference in coal production, per capita between Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0 terawatt-hours per person, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Malawi and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for coal production, per capita?
Malawi ranks 61st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 60th of 205 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Coal production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coal production, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-production-per-capita/malawi/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/coal-production-per-capita/malawi/united-kingdom/">Malawi vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Coal production, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coal production, per capita
Unit
terawatt-hours per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
205 places, 10,150 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Coal production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.