Argentina vs Zambia: Coal reserves
Argentina
800.00 million tonnes
in 2023
Zambia
945.00 million tonnes
in 2023
Argentina rank
48th
Zambia rank
45th
Coal reserves over time
- Argentina
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 945.00 million tonnes against 800.00 million tonnes in Argentina, a difference of 145.00 million tonnes.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 45th of 216 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 462.00 million tonnes | 45.00 million tonnes | 417.00 million tonnes | Argentina |
| 2010s | 680.00 million tonnes | 585.00 million tonnes | 95.00 million tonnes | Argentina |
| 2020s | 800.00 million tonnes | 945.00 million tonnes | 145.00 million tonnes | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coal reserves, Argentina or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 945.00 million tonnes against 800.00 million tonnes in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in coal reserves between Argentina and Zambia?
- 145.00 million tonnes, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Zambia rank globally for coal reserves?
- Argentina ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 45th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- U.S. Energy Information Administration (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Coal reserves. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Proved reserves, measured in tonnes, are generally those quantities that can be recovered in the future from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, according to geological and engineering information.