OECD members vs Zimbabwe: Combustible renewables and waste
OECD members
7.1%
in 2023
Zimbabwe
39.2%
in 2023
OECD members rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd
Combustible renewables and waste over time
- OECD members
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 39.2% against 7.1% in OECD members, a difference of 32.1%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 5.5 times OECD members's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
OECD members ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD members | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.6% | 51.8% | 48.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 4.0% | 41.1% | 37.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5.9% | 44.1% | 38.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6.8% | 43.6% | 36.8% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher combustible renewables and waste, OECD members or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 39.2% against 7.1% in OECD members as of 2023.
- What is the difference in combustible renewables and waste between OECD members and Zimbabwe?
- 32.1%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do OECD members and Zimbabwe rank globally for combustible renewables and waste?
- OECD members ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 46 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Combustible renewables and waste (% of total energy). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Combustible renewables and waste comprise solid biomass, liquid biomass, biogas, industrial waste, and municipal waste, measured as a percentage of total energy use. The indicator expresses the share of total energy supply.