Austria vs Sweden: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Austria
27,494 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Sweden
27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Austria rank
8th
Sweden rank
9th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Austria
- Sweden
How they compare
Austria currently reports 27,494 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Sweden, a difference of 60 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 9th of 35 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Austria or Sweden?
- Austria, at 27,494 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Austria and Sweden?
- 60 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Austria ranks 8th and Sweden ranks 9th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.