Belgium vs Estonia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Belgium
19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Estonia
10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Belgium rank
30th
Estonia rank
33rd
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Belgium
- Estonia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Estonia, a difference of 9,090 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.9 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 30th and Estonia ranks 33rd of 35 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Belgium or Estonia?
- Belgium, at 19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Belgium and Estonia?
- 9,090 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Estonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Estonia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Estonia ranks 33rd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.