Belgium vs Latvia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Belgium
19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Latvia
20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Belgium rank
30th
Latvia rank
28th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Belgium, a difference of 1,145 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Belgium or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 19,627 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Belgium and Latvia?
- 1,145 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Belgium ranks 30th and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.