Croatia vs Sweden: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Croatia
27,674 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Sweden
27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Croatia rank
6th
Sweden rank
9th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Croatia
- Sweden
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 27,674 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Sweden, a difference of 240 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 9th of 35 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Croatia or Sweden?
- Croatia, at 27,674 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 27,434 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Croatia and Sweden?
- 240 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Sweden rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Croatia ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 9th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.