Cyprus vs Latvia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Cyprus
22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Latvia
20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Cyprus rank
26th
Latvia rank
28th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Cyprus
- Latvia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia, a difference of 1,844 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Cyprus's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Cyprus or Latvia?
- Cyprus, at 22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Cyprus and Latvia?
- 1,844 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Latvia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Latvia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Cyprus ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.