Cyprus vs Serbia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Cyprus
22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Serbia
22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Cyprus rank
26th
Serbia rank
25th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Cyprus
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Cyprus, a difference of 67 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Cyprus ahead.
Cyprus ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Cyprus or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 22,616 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Cyprus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Cyprus and Serbia?
- 67 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Cyprus and Serbia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Cyprus ranks 26th and Serbia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.