Czechia vs Finland: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Czechia
17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Finland
14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Czechia rank
31st
Finland rank
32nd
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Czechia
- Finland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Finland, a difference of 2,618 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 31st and Finland ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Czechia or Finland?
- Czechia, at 17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Czechia and Finland?
- 2,618 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Finland rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Czechia ranks 31st and Finland ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.